Message-ID: <28274532.1075853233395.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 02:58:00 -0800 (PST)
From: mary.hain@enron.com
To: james.steffes@enron.com, bill.williams@enron.com, steve.c.hall@enron.com, 
	alan.comnes@enron.com, richard.sanders@enron.com, 
	dwatkiss@bracepatt.com, carrrn@bracepatt.com
Subject: Reporting out-of-market transactions
Cc: tim.belden@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: tim.belden@enron.com
X-From: Mary Hain
X-To: James D Steffes, Bill Williams, steve.c.hall@enron.com, Alan Comnes, Richard Sanders, dwatkiss@bracepatt.com, carrrn@bracepatt.com
X-cc: Tim Belden
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Richard_Sanders_Oct2001\Notes Folders\Iso_ pricecaps
X-Origin: Sanders-R
X-FileName: rsanders.nsf

Based on a discussion I had with Tim, we should report out-of-market 
transactions with the FERC and should not question the ISO about their 
reporting out-of-market transactions for the following reasons:

Even though the Commission's order referred only to bids into the ISO, it was 
not artfully written.  Otherwise FERC would not get any reporting information 
necessary for refunds.
We have always said that out-of-market should be more transparent and more 
liquid.  As long as this information is withheld from the market, these goals 
will not be achieved.
Nor will the Commission's goal of moving volumes out of the spot market be 
achieved if parties can simply withhold from the spot market and sell 
out-of-market without FERC scrutiny.